Las Vegas dentist breaks down full-arch implant options

By AI, Created 6:46 PM UTC, June 02, 2026, /AGP/ – True Dentistry’s Jim Willardsen, DDS is outlining the differences between All-on-4, All-on-6 and AOX for patients with major tooth loss. The comparison is meant to help patients choose a full-arch implant plan based on bone support, stability and long-term goals.

Why it matters: - Full-arch dental implants can restore a complete set of teeth for patients with significant tooth loss. - The choice between All-on-4, All-on-6 and AOX can affect whether a patient needs bone grafting, how bite forces are distributed and how personalized the treatment plan can be. - A better match between implant design and anatomy can improve the chances of a stable, long-lasting restoration.

What happened: - True Dentistry in Las Vegas said patients should understand the differences among All-on-4, All-on-6 and AOX before starting full-arch implant treatment. - Jim Willardsen, DDS, an implant dentist at True Dentistry, outlined how each approach works. - The practice said the comparison is especially relevant for patients facing major tooth loss. - For more information about Dr. Willardsen or True Dentistry, visit the company’s announcement.

The details: - All-on-4 uses four dental implants to support a full arch of prosthetic teeth. - Two All-on-4 implants are placed straight and two are angled toward the back of the jaw. - The angled placement is designed to use denser bone in the front of the jaw. - All-on-4 can often work for patients with some bone loss without bone grafting. - All-on-6 uses six implants instead of four. - The extra implants can widen the support base and spread bite forces more evenly across the jaw. - Dr. Willardsen said All-on-6 can be a strong choice for patients with enough bone structure. - Dr. Willardsen said the extra implants may help with restoration longevity by improving load distribution. - AOX, or All-on-X, varies the number of implants based on each patient’s anatomy, bone density and clinical needs. - AOX is designed to place as many implants as are appropriate for the individual case. - Dr. Willardsen said AOX reflects a shift toward personalized implant planning. - The “X” in AOX stands for flexibility in treatment planning.

Between the lines: - The release frames full-arch implant planning as a tradeoff between accessibility, stability and customization. - All-on-4 appears positioned as the most widely accessible option. - All-on-6 appears geared toward patients who can support a larger implant count and want added durability. - AOX signals a move away from one-size-fits-all treatment toward case-specific decisions. - The article also reinforces that bone quantity, bone quality, oral health, lifestyle and functional goals all shape the final recommendation.

What’s next: - Patients considering full-arch restoration are expected to get a comprehensive evaluation from a qualified implant dentist. - That evaluation should determine which protocol best fits the patient’s anatomy and long-term goals. - Dr. Willardsen is available for interview upon request. - True Dentistry lists offices in Las Vegas and Summerlin, Nevada, and can be reached at the phone numbers included in the release.

The bottom line: - All-on-4, All-on-6 and AOX each offer a route to full-arch restoration, but the best option depends on the patient, not the brand name.